- #Revit autodesk mac how to
- #Revit autodesk mac full
- #Revit autodesk mac code
- #Revit autodesk mac Pc
- #Revit autodesk mac mac
I would be fine with a crippled revit in most cases.
I mostly work on houses, outside of better site tools not sure what I would need added to Revit. I know what it is that is why I called it the "lazy way file server" for me it works great and no real set up. I'd much rather have the Revit team spend their time and effort on improving Revit and adding new an useful features.
#Revit autodesk mac mac
It's these hardware/software possibilities and recent jumps in performance that make me actively resist Revit being ported natively to macOS (even though I am a diehard Mac user). You will get redundancy, failure protection and super fast data access, provided that your network switch can handle the traffic. In an office situation you could go for something like a Drobo or one of the Netgear NAS appliances that support RAID and multiple ethernet ports. These things are a dime a dozen these days. I really would prefer a proper cure over the currently administered medication which merely lessens the severity of the Your WD drive is essentially a self-contained Linux box running a SMB server. Just so you know, I have a serious medical condition that causes me to gag slightly whenever I have to use Windows so it's not like I'm defending them or anything.
#Revit autodesk mac how to
There are a few tricks to fine tuning both the VM and Revit for optimal performance but it's not hard at all and there are plenty instructions on the web that demonstrate how to do this. I have a 2017 iMac and I enjoy very good performance. You do need a reasonably beefed up Mac for this but definitely not a MacPro.
I have been running Revit this way for years now and performance is not a problem. In the mean time I suggest that you try running Revit under Parallels Desktop. I've discussed this with other like-minded people who would love to see native Revit on macOS in the past and basically it comes down to this: porting something as complex as Revit to a completely different OS is really, really difficult and therefore really, really expensive. You can finally put out the perfect product and satisfy all I feel your paint but you're not going to convince anyone to give you anything by calling them idiots first. And now that it's subscription based, there's no more excuses for a "new release". If Autodesk focussed on fewer apps to do the job and wasting $$$$ doing so, then they could offer support for multiple platforms. Thinking of that ugly tower, seperate display, all the HW issues, cables, wires. If I was forced to use a PC.again, I would be extremely depressed as before. REVIT would be great to use, but not with WIN (at least I have SketchUp Pro). It is simply the most unintuitive, unappealing, uninspiring, absolutely depressing UI.
#Revit autodesk mac Pc
I've worked in Architecture most my life and with CAD since '97 (first computer was sgi O2, then PC by force due to ACAD, and then MAC in 2006, at first with virtual means and then VectorWorks but could not effectively open/edit/save DWG, then back to virtual until a few years ago when ACAD finally supported MAC - again). But of course Autodesk doesn't support it still and probably never will. I want to switch to REVIT LT from ACAD LT for MAC. Sure, thatĭoesn't say much about my PC at work but still, it's a pretty good solution. Home can run Revit in a VM and it outperforms my PC at work.
#Revit autodesk mac full
I wouldn't settle forĪnything else other than full feature parity. I'm not talking about some crippled half attempt.
#Revit autodesk mac code
Write all their code twice but I am certain that there is a not anīy the way, I would love to see a native version of Revit for macOS. Running two independent production lines. Operating system has it's quirks and demands and ACAD team most likely are Lots of people cite ArchiCAD as the antithesis of what I have justĭescribed but I am certain that it's not all roses for those guys. Interchangeable with all elements from all other vendors? Probably not. Manufacturers? Would you demand that this be a universal design totally Of such a building system should have designed it in such a way that youĬould substitute any element with any other element from other Would it be reasonable in such a scenario to complain that the manufacturer Will be selected for their ability to interact well with one another as Of standardised elements, most likely for a select group of vendors. Modular building you are going to settle on a certain platform and a bunch You're designing some sort of transportable and highly configurable, Please accept this comment in the best possible way but you don't soundĪllow me to provide you with an analogy form the construction industry.